完美者（wmzhe.com）网站以软件下载为基础，改版后的网站对功能性板块进行扩充，以期能够解决用户在软件使用过程中遇见的所有问题。网站新增了“软件百科”、“锦囊妙技”等频道，可以更好地对用户的软件使用全周期进行更加专业地服务。
PhraseExpress是一个非常方便地粘贴常用的字段的软件 ，可以很大程度上提高输入效率避免重复劳动。PhraseExpress 可以创建各种格式的短语/片语，如未格式化短语(纯文本)、RTF 短语、HTML 短语、Word 短语，然后通过快捷方式快速输入。
此外 PhraseExpress 还提供了强大的宏功能，可以将动态文本添加到短语中(如添加当前的日期，时间或计数变量等)、启动应用程序、文件或打开的程序。剪贴板缓存功能可以将最近复制的内容建立一个备份区，可以对每一条记录设置快捷键，转换为短语。
"锦囊妙技"栏目是聚合全网软件使用的技巧或者软件使用过程中各种问题的解答类文章，栏目设立伊始，小编欢迎各路软件大神朋友们踊跃投稿，在完美者平台分享大家的独门技巧。
本站文章素材来源于网络，大部分文章作者名称佚失，为了更利于用户阅读和使用，根据需要进行了重新排版和部分改编，本站收录文章只是以帮助用户解决实际问题为目的，如有版权问题请联系小编修改或删除，谢谢合作。
软件大小：8.55 MB
真没有呀 版权问题，不能有
How to Say I Love You Although many people use this powerful phrase loosely, there are times when you want to say "I love you" in a meaningful way. Whether you're professing your love to a romantic partner or expressing it to a relative or friend, it can be difficult to convey how much they really mean to you. But by keeping the following suggestions in mind, hopefully your love will not only be understood, but it will also be welcomed and returned. [edit] StepsDefine love The sincerity of the phrase is strengthened by knowing what love is, and what loving someone means to you. Determine the difference between love, infatuation and lust, and make sure it's genuine love that you feel for this person. Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Make it special. For many people, dropping the "I" allows the sentiment to be expressed casually, such as before separating (e.g. "Time to go. Bye! Love you!"). Using the full phrase, however, can be reserved for more intimate moments, especially during a special event, such as when a child is just born, or even to reassure someone when bad news has been received or during moments of cherished silence, like after a kiss. Make eye contact. If you love this person, hopefully you feel comfortable enough to gaze into their eyes when you express your feelings. Making eye contact shows sincerity and communicates trust.
Phrase-structure rules were used in early transformational grammar (TGG) to describe a given language's syntax. They were used to break a natural language sentence down into its constituent parts (also known as syntactic categories) namely phrasal categories and lexical categories (aka parts of speech). Phrasal categories include the noun phrase, verb phrase, and prepositional phrase; lexical categories include noun, verb, adjective, adverb, and many others. Phrase structure rules were not an invention of TGG; rather, early TGG's defining characteristics were those systems which it had in addition to phrase structure rules (the most obvious example being transformations; see the page transformational grammar for an overview of the development of TGG.) A grammar which uses phrase structure rules is called a phrase structure grammar.[edit]DefinitionPhrase structure rules are usually of the form A \to B \quad C, meaning that the constituent A is separated into the two subconstituents B and C. Some examples are: S \to NP \quad VP NP \to Det \quad N1 N1 \to (AP) \quad N1 \quad (PP)The first rule reads: An S consists of an NP followed by a VP. This means A sentence consists of a noun phrase followed by a verb phrase. The next one: A noun phrase consists of a determiner followed by a noun.Further explanations of the constituents: S, Det, NP, VP, APAssociated with phrase structure rules is a famous example of a grammatically correct sentence. The sentence was constructed by Noam Chomsky as an illustration that syntactically but not semantically correct sentences are possible.Colorless green ideas sleep furiously can be diagrammed as a phrase tree, as below:Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.where S represents a grammatical sentence.[edit]Alternative approachesA number of theories of grammar dispense with the notion of phrase structure rules and operate with the notion of schema instead. Here phrase structures are not derived from rules that combine words, but from the specification or instantiation of syntactic schemata or configurations, often expressing some kind of semantic content independently of the specific words that appear in them. This approach is essentially equivalent to a system of phrase structure rules combined with a noncompositional semantic theory, since grammatical formalisms based on rewriting rules are generally equivalent in power to those based on substitution into schemata.So, in this type of approach, instead of being derived from the application of a number of phrase structure rules, the sentence "colorless green ideas sleep furiously" would be generated by filling the words into the slots of a schema having the following structure:(NP(ADJ N) VP(V) AP(ADV))And which would express the following conceptual contentX DOES Y IN THE MANNER OF ZThough they are noncompositional, such models are monotonic. This approach is highly developed within Construction grammar, and has had some influence in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical functional grammar.
